Tiger Woods Circus & Social Disease
.

Over 90% of communication is non-verbal. You hear that little stat thrown out often when people talk about interpersonal human relationships. Is that number completely accurate? I don’t know, but I one thing remains certain: The majority of human communication is established non-verbally. Such defines the abomination that was Tiger Wood’s presentation and press conference.
He uttered an obviously carefully written speech by a team of professional speechwriters. The speech itself was extremely well written. It hit the right notes, and appealed to the right emotions. These speeches are written to hit certain psychological points and this speech hit those points. It appealed to people’s compassion and it appealed to our sense of being humans all too capable of making mistakes.
One thing was lacking: Any sort of demeanor that showed he was sincere. He lacked emotion. It was more like,
“Awww, fuck, I gotta do this, because I am in hot water, and my advisors/publicists whom I pay good money for tell me this is the right thing to do. Sponsors, are you watching this? Shit, why can’t I just pay someone to read this for me? Is Steven Seagal available? He likes making dramatic speeches with no emotion that still trump my delivery….Hey, corporate sponsors, you are watching this, right?”
Well, I guess Steve Seagal wasn’t available and Tiger was told to do the speech himself. His advisors forgot to give him one pointer: “Hey Tiger, try to come across as sincere and that you really care.” Or maybe they tried, and this is still what we got.
Agent Smith from the movie “The Matrix” could have managed to do a better job than this guy. A soulless robotic speech that became worse with every minute really has stirred up tense reactions, specially from women.
I suppose most men don’t really care. They probably have the attitude of “Well, he wanted to bang a lot of chicks. I’d do it too if I were in his shoes.” But Tiger’s case is interesting because it resembles another “Scandal” from about 10 years ago, that of President William Jefferson Clinton.
Intriguingly enough, a lot of women forgave Bill Clinton very quickly. That’s what’s fascinating about it. There was this attitude of, “Well, the guy is stressed, and he needed a release.” In some places, the backlash turned towards Hillary. Maybe she should have been keeping her man happy. That’s what makes this comparison amazing.
Bill was the President, leader for the free world, fooling around with an intern inserting a cigar in her vagina, and yet most people (without a political agenda) were quick to let it go. With Tiger, not so much. One key element separates the two: Likeability. Clinton comes across as likable, someone you could go to a restaurant and have dinner with as well as a glass of wine.
Tiger comes across as a guy who has stick up his ass. Who knows, he may be a real nice guy to hang with, but his public persona does not convey that, and what’s what matters. People see the public persona and make a snap judgment.
————————-
- Identifying with each character
Here is where it becomes fascinating: Women watching this identify with either one of two characters, the woman who was cheated on, or the one who was cheated with. There aren’t any other options.
In Bill Clinton’s case, women who forgave him identified themelves with either Monica or Hilary. With Monica, they see it as some super filthy romance novel type of torrid affair in the White House. Those who identify with Hilary, ultimately, come to see it as a mistake made by a man who is a good guy and means well.
In Tiger Wood’s case, it’s different. Those who identify with the mistresses see it as some guy who just used them for cheap sex and was quick to sell them out. Those who identify with the wife see it as a cheating guy who has no backbone. He went into hiding for months, then finally came out for a press conference where he took no questions, and will go back to hiding.
If there is a quality more dislikable than infidelity, it’s cowardice. It’s a guy who is just looking to save his ass and that’s all he cares about. Such is the way Tiger Woods comes across to the female population. They can’t see a redeeming quality from either perspective. As a result, it induces a lot of anger from women. No matter what, a percentage of women would have been angered by his actions. There also would have been some who were understanding and very forgiving, a lot more than there are now.
————————-
In my estimation, Tiger had two choices:
- Choice 1: Admit the situation, make a quick apology, and get back on the golf course. Allow his playing to dazzle people who do care about golf and those who don’t care about golf don’t watch anyway. This is what Kobe Bryant did and he was accused of rape. Even one account of rape is far worse than multiple accounts of consenting adults engaging in extramarital affairs.
Truth of the matter is that in one year, no one is going to give a shit. Really, no one is going to care in one year. Some people don’t even care now.
- Choice 2: Make a sincere apology, and move on. This is what he tried to do, but the problem is that he doesn’t have that Bill Clinton “Likable” factor going for him. By making a lengthy phony apology, he accomplished two things:
- Made the situation into a very big deal
- Made himself look worse, by appearing to be a phony person.
As for me, I didn’t care about Tiger Woods before his “Transgressions.” I don’t care about him now. I don’t particularly like golf, and don’t even consider it a sport. It’s a skill-game much like bowling. Hence, I am rather indifferent to golf, Woods, and the entire issue. Its sociological impact is what I find intriguing.
I find the social significance of this a bit alarming. Considering that we live in a nation that is waging war on two fronts, Afghanistan & Iraq, an economy full of unemployed people, crashed real estate market, and not to mention that recent quake in Haiti has left people without access to so much as a band-aid.
Yet, the eyes of the nation are glued to a 30-minutes press conference because some professional golfer cheated on his wife. Words can’t begin to describe the absurdity of this. Basically, some dude you don’t know, who has a wife you don’t know, banged a bunch of sluts you don’t know (but perhaps would like to now), and he is apologizing for 20-minutes for something that is essentially between him and his wife.
If you think about it, it makes no sense at all. It’s like, “Hey, I shouted at my grandma last week. That was not a nice thing to do. So……. I am going to apologize to Joe the plumber (or other random guy.)”
There have been football players who have stabbed people, and killed people. One guy was completely wasted on alcohol while driving and killed another man. Granted, they’re not as famous as Tiger Woods, but people have done far worse.
I am not a spin-doctor but part of me thinks it would have been better if he has made a 5 minute apology a long time ago. Something like “I fucked up, I admit it. I am trying to work it out with my wife. There are bigger problems in the world. I am going to get back to doing what I do best, which is my profession and my occupation. Let’s all get back to our lives…”
Instead he dragged it on, and now he is going to take a year off from his job, try to hide in the shadows. No one will care in a year, except when he announces he is coming back, which will make the issue resurface briefly. (Which is he should get back to golf quickly.) All in all, it’ pretty silly.
Nice comparison with Clinton.
What I think is amazing in these situations is how much these situations touch people, even amidst all the disaster going on, which one would guess is more important. I mean, if people spend so much time and energy discussing and following Tiger’s case, it surely means that there’s much more to it than initially meets the eye. It’s surely not that people are just stupid.
In my opinion a lot of this interest and resentment comes from the dirty truth that humans (men and women) for the most part will, at some point, desire more than one sexual partner. Because we’re taught to botte it up and not admit that it’s natural we probably take some of our guilt and anger out on public figures like Tiger.
Did you ever read the book “Women’s infidelity”? Opened my eyes quite a bit to the reality men and women face when it comes to infidelity.
My european mind cannot understand why the public in general requires, (no, demands!) an explanation and an apology.
Seriously, what to people care?
He is a good golfer who fucks girls. Big thing. He is not a president who may be “distracted” by his affairs. Basically whoever he fucks should be his private thing.
And yet he actually agreed to go through that humiliating show. Hell, if I was him I’d take my millions of dollars and with no apologys keep playing golf.
It’s the absurdity of morally stoning a public figure what amazes me. Really, who gives a shit? Seems the american viewer does. This tells us something about the inner deamons and frustrations of the average american.
Good article, by the way.
Mojito,
Perhaps there is more than meets the eye, but then again, we live in a society where people have the need to send twitter messages about what they just ate for lunch.
So people aren’t all that sophisticated. They just want entertainment at any cost, and Tiger-Woods drama provides that in between breaks between crappy reality-TV shows.
European guy,
I know Europeans don’t understand why this stuff is a big deal (and rightly so.) You know, Tiger woods has made about a billion dollars in income in his career (may become half after a divorce.) Even if he never made another dime off of his corporate sponsors, he’d still make good money from playing Golf and winning tournaments.
Part of me is curious to see what would have happened if he had come out with a more ballsy attitude, basically saying, “Yes, I fucked up. Cheated on my wife with random sluts. Now I have to repair this with my wife. I am getting back to doing what I do best. Thanks for your understanding. See you on the golf course.”
Instead he treated it like it was a matter of national security. He actually made it into a bigger deal. My hunch is that it’s all about the money. He wants his sponsors back to pay him $$$$$ for advertising their products.
Fascinating analysis. Anything from the heart would have been better than an obviously forced, fake diatribe.
Honestly, I thought Tigers speech was great. I thought he was really sincere
Been reader of your blog for quite a time now and it’s a great article as usual, thanks man.
Reading this made me think about not-so-similar situation, but the murder case of OJ Simpson. He was definetely very charismatic, and if i remember correctly, after this case he was still relatively likable figure and i suppose, popular amongst women. So, my question is, that if you’re being charismatic, until what point can you get away with almost anything and people tend to forgive you very easily? For example, lets take Tommy Lee: after being in jail for beating his wife back then, Pamela Anderson, people still kinda had this “he’s a rockstar and this kind of stuff comes with this status”-attitude towards him. I’ve read Tommy’s book and he seems like a nice guy, so it’s easy to see, why the American (Motley Crue is not so known here as in the States) crowd likes him.
If you find some time to give us your thoughts and maybe some other real-life examples (OJ and Tommy Lee were just the first ones who came in mind, probably there are many more) that would be awesome!
Take care and greetings from Northern Europe!
My dictionary defines the word slut as “a slovenly woman. A promiscuous woman.” (I had to look up sloven and it means untidy) What is the equivalent term for a man? Pick up artist? I’d say that because there is not an equivalent term for men that we must use the same term used for women to describe men whose actions are the equivalent. Fair is fair. Therefore, Tiger Woods didn’t just date sluts, he IS a slut and should have called himself one.
Cameron, certainly you’ve been quite the “slut” at times in your life. Cameron, are you in a monogamous relationship these days and promoting monogamy or are you still quite the slut yourself? How many sex partners at any given time or over a year makes a man or a woman a slut? (probably you have a different definition of slut I’m guessing)
Here is a definition to consider. There is a book by Dossey Easton called “The Ethical Slut.” It redefines the word slut as the following. “a slut is a person of any gender who has the courage to lead life according to the radical proposition that sex is nice and pleasure is good for you.”
Great analysis!
Also i must agree 100% to what “European” said (i am german).
This hole thing is an american cultural phenomen: it starts with the strange need of the american public that someone has to apologize in public about private things that nobody should care exept the people involved and ends with the scary idea to make a “hockey mum” to the vice president of the united states ;).
I guess the majority of europeen leaders would have no chance to run for a local mayor-job: the last german chancler was married 3 times, i guess the last 10 french presidents where married and had girlfriends all the time, and the italien president Berlusconi – well i guess this guy spent more money on whores in his live than all the readers in this blog together (but i guess his IQ is higher than Sarah Palins and George W.´s combined, haha)
But well, different countries, different cultures. You americans have a strange need to feel that people in public have to be “better persons in moral categories”, even if these moral categories are from the 18th century.
Maybe this has to do with the fact that lot of settlers who immigrated 300 years ago from europe where pilgrims?
Ricardo wrote:
Hey Ricardo,
I don’t think it’s so much “Getting Away” with anything as it is that people are more accepting of that person’s way of being.
Certainly people who are charismatic are given more leeway but it’s that they also have a certain way of living and are congruent with that.
I think you may have the wrong impression of O.J. in America. Most Americans never forgave him for it. People are willing to accept a lot, but can’t really overlook actions that leave victims behind such as cold-blooded murder or pedophilia (in case of MJ).
Guys like Tommy Lee, or Charlie Sheen haven’t done such things. They live their life a certain way, and are congruent with it. Most people who come across them seem to think they’re not bad guys.
——-
Casandra,
Your personal agenda is so strong that you completely missed the humor aspect of that word & the context it was used in.
Don’t tell me you slept with Tiger Woods too? Very touchy on this topic.
——
Matt,
Yeah, it’s all very ridiculous. I wonder when there’ll come a day where we’ll have a “Divorced” President, or perhaps one that has a girlfriend who lives with him, instead of the charade that he is part of a married team.
Thanks for the feedback,
Got another article coming up about society, and social behavior which you’re going to really dig. This time it’s about GURUS…
Cameron
On another note, this reminds me of Arnold again. If my memory serve me, back when arnold first got elected, several women accused him of raping those women. It went on for a few weeks.
I think he straightup denies it or apologize for it for a little bit.
Then one time at a press conference where he spend 99 percent talking about how he’s going to govern california. One of the news reporter said “what do you think of the so and so rape case”. Arnold barely glance at the reporter and said “old news”. lol